← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_torino

Final energy-1.8590568384hartree
Shots1024
Runtime executionsingle-job
Resilience1
MappingPT
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
PT
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
25
Best energy (Ha)
-1.91205

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_torino
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Heron r1
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
single-job
Shots
1024
Precision
0.03125
Resilience
1
Submitted
2025-11-10T17:00:54+01:00
Wall time (s)
452

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
1
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
1
Two-qubit gates
0
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

20 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -1.833218571017.3459 11
2succeeded -0.512151066919.4712 11
3succeeded -0.903126618418.1236 11
4succeeded -1.607273102817.8494 11
5succeeded -1.618179815816.9208 11
6succeeded -1.874746944617.243 11
7succeeded -1.796177885617.6331 11
8succeeded -1.857989653824.0621 11
9succeeded -1.872787440925.7374 11
10succeeded -1.857744253524.7946 11
11succeeded -1.887359098524.6796 11
12succeeded -1.850246945724.131 11
13succeeded -1.885075490424.4442 11
14succeeded -1.854078256224.945 11
15succeeded -1.842207981826.5712 11
16succeeded -1.912047963525.6326 11
17succeeded -1.889645607925.485 11
18succeeded -1.845931756124.9284 11
19succeeded -1.867795621126.4995 11
20succeeded -1.859056838423.1817 11