← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_pittsburgh

Final energy-1.6174780855hartree
Shots256
Runtime executionsingle-job
Resilience1
MappingJW
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
JW
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
30
Best energy (Ha)
-1.61748

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_pittsburgh
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Heron r3
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
single-job
Shots
256
Precision
0.0625
Resilience
1
Submitted
2026-03-03T15:08:58+01:00
Wall time (s)
439

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
4
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
96
Two-qubit gates
48
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

19 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -1.612016916772.9057 11
2succeeded -0.713813372420.3821 11
3succeeded -0.820031048219.1474 11
4succeeded -1.218829523031.6393 11
5succeeded -1.491049418919.1476 11
6succeeded -1.462039330119.5561 11
7succeeded -1.476234530120.0706 11
8succeeded -1.516837333819.4532 11
9succeeded -1.511197018819.5329 11
10succeeded -1.592887666919.4508 11
11succeeded -1.565511147120.3781 11
12succeeded -1.465371381320.0349 11
13succeeded -1.373390885629.2584 11
14succeeded -1.617478085534.8031 11
15succeeded -1.533700567221.2128 11
16succeeded -1.589529742619.8883 11
17succeeded -1.552267948419.9628 11
18succeeded -1.463386546519.6009 11
19succeeded -1.510519375519.5134 11