← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_brussels

Final energy-1.0407258686hartree
Shots16
Runtime executionsingle-job
Resilience1
MappingJW
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
JW
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
30
Best energy (Ha)
-1.04073

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_brussels
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Eagle r3
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
single-job
Shots
16
Precision
0.25
Resilience
1
Submitted
2026-03-02T22:27:58+01:00
Wall time (s)
329

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
4
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
96
Two-qubit gates
48
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

21 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -0.750411460418.2209 10
2succeeded -0.872883147215.5588 10
3succeeded -1.040725868615.2298 10
4succeeded -0.760452615615.2309 10
5succeeded -0.810339927215.0418 10
6succeeded -0.896006794314.9637 10
7succeeded -0.893289573415.3362 10
8succeeded -0.779034830615.3043 10
9succeeded -0.882855422816.6375 11
10succeeded -0.900353201515.2314 10
11succeeded -0.788737581614.7175 10
12succeeded -0.959947943215.4391 10
13succeeded -0.939938250214.6985 10
14succeeded -0.920580074715.5736 10
15succeeded -0.884596966115.5575 10
16succeeded -0.920627344715.7824 10
17succeeded -0.841951887215.2045 10
18succeeded -0.987770552315.2152 10
19succeeded -0.841165304714.7595 10
20succeeded -0.904660417019.0839 14
21succeeded -0.824797775215.3956 10