← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_pittsburgh

Final energy-1.8658724946hartree
Shots1024
Runtime executionsession
Resilience2
MappingPT
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
PT
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
30
Best energy (Ha)
-1.88374

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_pittsburgh
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Heron r3
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
session
Shots
1024
Precision
0.03125
Resilience
2
Submitted
2025-12-30T16:49:11+01:00
Wall time (s)
392

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
1
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
1
Two-qubit gates
0
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

19 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -1.83554841392270.6 12
2succeeded -0.544192664519.6273 11
3succeeded -0.826320446020.8711 12
4succeeded -1.642934918419.9647 12
5succeeded -1.685932772920.0526 11
6succeeded -1.877890708219.3566 11
7succeeded -1.847867415919.6753 11
8succeeded -1.846243546520.587 11
9succeeded -1.883740832320.1672 11
10succeeded -1.883337302020.9573 11
11succeeded -1.856191523919.9554 11
12succeeded -1.857497450419.6551 11
13succeeded -1.839185126119.9804 11
14succeeded -1.857458879019.2624 11
15succeeded -1.854923508819.3444 11
16succeeded -1.847528595618.7237 11
17succeeded -1.856455935419.7949 11
18succeeded -1.853507698819.8238 11
19succeeded -1.865872494619.575 12