← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_pittsburgh

Final energy-1.6769049395hartree
Shots16
Runtime executionsingle-job
Resilience1
MappingJW
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
JW
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
30
Best energy (Ha)
-1.6769

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_pittsburgh
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Heron r3
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
single-job
Shots
16
Precision
0.25
Resilience
1
Submitted
2026-03-03T14:33:01+01:00
Wall time (s)
1215

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
4
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
96
Two-qubit gates
48
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

22 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -1.636829447349.0878 14
2succeeded -0.862182770138.1951 14
3succeeded -0.824951304055.0155 14
4succeeded -1.198459074420.4128 11
5succeeded -1.507822359420.5148 11
6succeeded -1.279732681218.6225 10
7succeeded -1.556852423420.8307 10
8succeeded -1.435424517320.3897 11
9succeeded -1.468551654133.159 17
10succeeded -1.531802949029.3653 11
11succeeded -1.563688761656.8901 14
12succeeded -1.490444375569.9398 17
13succeeded -1.560903279553.1563 17
14succeeded -1.3965714887168.291 22
15succeeded -1.646006375122.1701 11
16succeeded -1.676904939520.9447 10
17succeeded -1.560145060021.2071 11
18succeeded -1.545208088220.3067 10
19succeeded -1.6220195706127.903 14
20succeeded -1.4647128049167.529 14
21succeeded -1.595232649668.1994 17
22succeeded -1.5448004090111.681 14