← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_brussels

Final energy-0.9393650332hartree
Shots512
Runtime executionsingle-job
Resilience1
MappingJW
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
JW
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
30
Best energy (Ha)
-0.939365

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_brussels
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Eagle r3
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
single-job
Shots
512
Precision
0.0441942
Resilience
1
Submitted
2026-03-02T22:48:36+01:00
Wall time (s)
369

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
4
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
96
Two-qubit gates
48
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

21 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -0.843969875215.5231 10
2succeeded -0.822137713315.2979 10
3succeeded -0.788848630414.9996 10
4succeeded -0.751262442415.3342 10
5succeeded -0.845278941415.3691 10
6succeeded -0.928103148115.133 10
7succeeded -0.783668898916.7246 10
8succeeded -0.759567165315.4866 11
9succeeded -0.847976132320.2675 15
10succeeded -0.869684361816.3436 11
11succeeded -0.791244754715.2187 10
12succeeded -0.814858442615.3231 10
13succeeded -0.756726185715.5272 10
14succeeded -0.939365033215.4963 10
15succeeded -0.888268593835.3436 11
16succeeded -0.869176511215.9531 10
17succeeded -0.815413218720.6217 12
18succeeded -0.929847895517.3741 12
19succeeded -0.903226033720.3306 12
20succeeded -0.799773625015.9019 11
21succeeded -0.854164717220.3846 12