← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_pittsburgh

Final energy-1.6019234168hartree
Shots512
Runtime executionsingle-job
Resilience1
MappingJW
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
JW
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
30
Best energy (Ha)
-1.60192

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_pittsburgh
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Heron r3
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
single-job
Shots
512
Precision
0.0441942
Resilience
1
Submitted
2026-03-03T15:16:48+01:00
Wall time (s)
456

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
4
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
96
Two-qubit gates
48
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

22 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -1.529406616832.8407 11
2succeeded -0.676363206021.2985 11
3succeeded -0.883533696320.3764 11
4succeeded -1.247895452419.6601 11
5succeeded -1.571112506420.0694 11
6succeeded -1.211527993319.7615 11
7succeeded -1.583287953020.5807 11
8succeeded -1.488741493721.5031 11
9succeeded -1.506271257919.7741 11
10succeeded -1.484547341319.7647 11
11succeeded -1.574032545820.4795 12
12succeeded -1.601923416819.3514 11
13succeeded -1.512914389120.5637 11
14succeeded -1.601888513119.5574 11
15succeeded -1.590662663220.3801 11
16succeeded -1.486428477220.2621 11
17succeeded -1.525729466419.1838 11
18succeeded -1.476045708019.6129 11
19succeeded -1.591222351719.0044 11
20succeeded -1.566433955919.6637 11
21succeeded -1.482674021820.4223 11
22succeeded -1.427868247719.7728 11