← Back to search

H2

H2 VQE accuracy-cost benchmark · hardware · ibm_brussels

Final energy-0.9641643581hartree
Shots16
Runtime executionsingle-job
Resilience1
MappingJW
Active space2e,2o

Method

Mapper
JW
Ansatz
UCC
Optimizer
COBYLA
Maximum iterations
30
Best energy (Ha)
-0.964164

Execution

Mode
hardware
Provider
IBM Quantum
Compute resource
ibm_brussels
Resource type
ibm quantum hardware
Processor family
Eagle r3
Processor model
Processor revision
Qubits
Connectivity
Runtime execution
single-job
Shots
16
Precision
0.25
Resilience
1
Submitted
2026-02-26T22:58:14+01:00
Wall time (s)
332

Molecular system

Charge
0
Multiplicity
1
Basis
STO-3G
Active space
2e,2o
Active electrons
2
Spatial orbitals
2
Geometry units
angstrom

Circuit

Logical qubits
4
Physical qubits
Parameters
Depth
96
Two-qubit gates
48
Hamiltonian terms

Dataset publication

Associated articles

Compute access

  • Fraunhofer Quantum Now and EQeS · IBM Quantum · allocation: Fraunhofer Quantum Now

Optimization trajectory

21 recorded objective evaluations. Charts use cumulative time so convergence cost remains comparable across calculations.

Energy (Ha)
Cumulative quantum time (s)
Cumulative wall time (s)
AttemptOutcomeEnergy (Ha)Elapsed (s)Quantum (s)Parameters
1succeeded -0.929985420815.9488 10
2succeeded -0.922658435815.747 10
3succeeded -0.899347608116.1264 10
4succeeded -0.964164358115.6973 10
5succeeded -0.707953596915.0419 10
6succeeded -0.797857999415.2218 10
7succeeded -0.904642385815.4841 10
8succeeded -0.884170408915.6752 10
9succeeded -0.771024072715.5358 10
10succeeded -0.799113382315.0393 10
11succeeded -0.806397643924.422 19
12succeeded -0.888026264416.6461 11
13succeeded -0.809112508114.6712 10
14succeeded -0.743345890815.1599 10
15succeeded -0.863101144815.0184 10
16succeeded -0.785166882815.0812 10
17succeeded -0.851881394314.6873 10
18succeeded -0.817680853115.5367 10
19succeeded -0.902557284615.0409 10
20succeeded -0.895371639715.073 10
21succeeded -0.846959058314.8813 10